建议位置:高2·下;原创能力递进,不等同于学校实际学期/人教版单元。只训练书面英语。每个编号计一道练习;编号内小项不重复计数。
学习目标
- 用段落功能与前后衔接共同定位缺句
- 用代词、复现、转折和范围检验候选句
- 识别主题相关但逻辑位置不合的干扰项
- 在“媒体、信息与数字判断”语境中区分常用词义、搭配并完成新的书面迁移。
核心讲解
七选五不是七个词的填空,而是通常从七个完整句子选五个,填入语篇五个空格;两个选项不用。先读首尾和段落逻辑,再选句,最后把全文连读。
1. 三步定位
先判断空格功能:主题句、解释、例子、转折还是总结。再找连接证据:this/they 的先行内容、another 的前一项、however 的反向关系、同义复现。最后查语义范围:候选句是否突然引入没讨论过的人/设备?是否把建议变成绝对保证?
2. 双向检验
只与前句相连还不够,必须能带出后句。主题词重复也不是充分条件。第一空若后句是“Then…”,可能需要前一步,但不能只凭 Then 就不读内容。遇到两个似可选句,比较信息新旧:先介绍对象,再用代词/限定词指回。
3. 订正方法
每空写一条前证据和一条后证据;干扰项写具体不合点,不写“感觉不通”。本篇所有句子原创,答案不靠课本记忆。
主题词汇拓展:媒体、信息与数字判断
下面的词条按本课情境扩展意义与搭配,不是课标完整词表。先把词分成“人/物、行动、性质/关系”三组;同一中文词不保证英语可互换。每条搭配示范本课采用的义项。读完语境再做新增的两项迁移题;能认出词义但不能在句中正确使用时,仍应保留为待复习项。
本课词汇与搭配
| 词条 | 词性 / 条目类型 | 核心义 | 语境搭配 |
|---|---|---|---|
| archive | v./n. | 归档;档案 | archive a webpage |
| bookmark | v./n. | 收藏;书签 | bookmark an article |
| retrieve | v. | 检索;取回 | retrieve information |
| contradict | v. | 与……矛盾 | contradict a claim |
| source | n. | 来源 | check the source |
| assess | v. | 评估 | assess reliability |
| uncertainty | n. | 不确定性 | identify uncertainty |
| integrate | v. | 整合 | integrate new evidence |
| framework | n. | 框架 | a research framework |
| relevance | n. | 相关性 | judge relevance |
| coherent | adj. | 连贯的 | a coherent explanation |
| assurance | n. | 保证;确信 | false assurance |
| headline | 单词 | 标题 | a misleading headline |
| caption | 单词 | 图片说明 | read the caption |
| editorial | 单词 | 社论;编辑的 | an editorial decision |
| broadcast | 单词 | 广播;播出 | a news broadcast |
| coverage | 单词 | 报道 | media coverage |
| journalism | 单词 | 新闻业 | responsible journalism |
| journalist | 单词 | 记者 | interview a journalist |
| source attribution | 短语 | 来源归属说明 | clear source attribution |
| quotation | 单词 | 引语 | an accurate quotation |
| paraphrase | 单词 | 释义;改述 | paraphrase a claim |
| summary | 单词 | 概要 | write a concise summary |
| fact-check | 单词 | 事实核查 | fact-check a report |
| misinformation | 单词 | 错误信息 | correct misinformation |
| disinformation | 单词 | 故意传播的虚假信息 | identify disinformation |
| bias | 单词 | 偏向 | recognise a possible bias |
| perspective | 单词 | 视角 | another perspective |
| credibility | 单词 | 可信度 | assess credibility |
| verification | 单词 | 核验 | independent verification |
| anonymous | 单词 | 匿名的 | an anonymous source |
| rumour | 单词 | 传言 | an unconfirmed rumour |
| viral | 单词 | 迅速传播的 | a viral post |
| algorithm | 单词 | 算法 | a recommendation algorithm |
| feed | 单词 | 信息流 | a social-media feed |
| clickbait | 单词 | 诱点击标题 | avoid clickbait |
| engagement | 单词 | 参与;互动 | online engagement |
| moderation | 单词 | 内容管理;适度 | content moderation |
| misquote | 单词 | 错误引用 | misquote a speaker |
| contextualise | 单词 | 放入背景解释 | contextualise a statistic |
| cross-check | 单词 | 交叉核对 | cross-check dates |
| correction | 单词 | 更正 | publish a correction |
阅读材料
Original gap-matching passage: From Collecting to Understanding
Saving an article can feel like finishing a piece of research. Yet a folder full of links may tell you very little about what you understand. [1] Before opening another page, write down a question you actually want to answer.
As you read, make a brief note of the author’s main claim. [2] A statistic, a personal story and a controlled experiment do not support an argument in exactly the same way. Recording the kind of support makes later comparisons easier.
New information may conflict with what you already believe. [3] Instead, check whether the sources studied different groups, used different methods or asked different questions. A disagreement may reveal the limits of both accounts.
When you stop reading, explain the issue in your own words without looking at your notes. [4] Use it to decide what to investigate next, rather than pretending that every gap has been filled.
Research is therefore not best measured by the size of your collection. [5] A small set of well-examined sources may be more useful than hundreds of links you have never compared.
Options(各选项最多用一次)
A. Also record how the author supports that claim.
B. Mark any uncertainty that remains in your explanation.
C. The more pages you save, the more accurate your knowledge automatically becomes.
D. A better approach is to organise your reading around a specific question.
E. What matters is whether you can explain what you know, what you do not know and why.
F. That conflict is not, by itself, a reason to throw the new information away.
G. Expensive software guarantees that every source you collect is true.
主题词汇语境:媒体、信息与数字判断
A viral headline claimed that a town had banned bicycles. The full report described a temporary restriction on one path during repairs. A journalist checked the notice, contacted the council and published a correction. The mistake might have been misinformation, but without evidence of deliberate deception it would be premature to label it disinformation. Good source attribution and a clear explanation of context helped readers see how the original claim had changed in transmission.
例题解析
例(独立于练习) “A notebook can hold questions as well as answers. ____. These questions may guide your next reading.” 缺句需提供可被 These questions 回指的内容,例如 Write down anything the text leaves unexplained。一个只说 notebook 封面颜色的选项虽同主题词,却不能衔接。
练习
为阅读材料空格[1]选择选项,并给前后证据。
为空格[2]选择选项,并说明记录的对象。
为空格[3]选择选项,解释转折。
为空格[4]选择选项,解释“it”的指代。
为空格[5]选择选项,解释其总结作用。
两个未用选项是什么?分别说明为什么不能放入全文任一空格。
把本篇建议用自己的话整理成三项中文操作清单,不增添作者没有提倡的“只收集支持自己观点的信息”。
【主题词汇·辨义】为什么本语境不能直接把misinformation定为disinformation?headline与full report中范围有何差别?
【主题词汇·迁移】写两句事实核查提示,至少用cross-check、quotation、context中的两个词;不能仅说“不要相信互联网”。
参考答案与解析 · 完成练习后展开
参考答案与解析
D。首段提出保存网页不等于学会,D提出改成围绕问题做笔记,后文“a question you actually want to answer”承接 question。
A。前句要求记录作者说了什么;A加入作者如何支持主张,后句“a statistic…a personal story…an experiment”正是 evidence 类型。记录的是观点与证据,不是所有句子。
F。前文承认新资料可能与当前理解冲突;F说这种不一致不是丢弃资料的理由,后文 Instead 建议检验来源和条件,形成合理转折与行动。
B。前句写自己的简短解释,B要求标出自己不确定的地方;后句 it 指该 uncertainty(不确定之处/不确定性),用它指导下一次搜索。
E。末段总结研究不以文件夹大小衡量,E转为能否解释已知、仍不确定和原因,与开篇保存资料不等于学习呼应。
C、G。C将大量收藏直接等同知识,违背首尾论点;G突然要求昂贵软件且宣称保证真理,全文未讨论软件购买,强保证也与不确定性意识相反。不能仅说“没有关键词”。
示例:①以具体问题组织笔记,并区分主张与支持证据;②遇到冲突时核查来源和研究条件,而非删除异见;③用自己的话解释并标出不确定点,以它规划下一次查找。每项需有可执行动作。
misinformation是错误信息,不一定故意;disinformation强调有意欺骗,文中未证实动机。标题将一条道路临时限制扩大成全城禁自行车,范围与时长都被扩大。核查需保留这两项。
示例:Cross-check a quotation against the original report before sharing it. Read the surrounding context to see whether the speaker was describing one case or making a broader claim. 要点:有可执行步骤;区分个案与普遍范围;不把媒介本身当真假判断标准。
订正与迁移
先遮住答案独立完成,再为每处错误记录“语境线索—适用规则—我的新例句”。隔一天换一个主题复做,不以背熟本页答案代替迁移。完整篇章写作按题后量规人工核查,短句产出按答案中的结构与信息要点自查;不把示例当成唯一答案。
课程与来源说明
原创高中书面英语能力递进课;参考人教版必修—选择性必修的能力梯度,但未取得学习者学校的准确版次和教学表,年级/学期仅为建议学习位置,不等同于官方教材单元对应。课标以2017年版2025年修订为当前版本;不把2020年文本称为最新,也不声称已逐条核对2025全文。考试形式参照已核验的江西/新课标公开说明;不含听力。
本课讲解、例句、语篇和题目为原创。来源链接用于课程/考试形式定位,不表示转载官方试题或逐句对应教材: